kottke.org home archives + xml about kottke.org contact me
kottke.org - home of fine hypertext products

10,000,000th Blogger post

At some point today, someone posted the 10,000,000th post to a Blogger-powered weblog. Who was it? Were you close?

Reader Comments
29 comments
jkottke says:

Here's the closest I could find after a short search: 10003621.

» by jkottke on Feb 22, 2002 at 07:55 PM
davidmsc says:

J: How did you know that someone posted the 10,000,000th post? And if so -- how come you don't know which one it is? Just curious...thanks.

» by davidmsc on Feb 22, 2002 at 09:44 PM
dave says:

I remember looking at my posts yesterday and thinking that it would hit that mark. I could be wrong but I think all of the blogger events hit the same database, so the 10,000,000th post could in fact be someone's weblog. At any rate, I still don't know where it is (I was off by about sixteen thousand).

» by dave on Feb 22, 2002 at 11:12 PM
Pittsburghian says:

Don't worry about that 10^7 post. You have more important concerns. When are you going to update that biography of yours?

» by Pittsburghian on Feb 23, 2002 at 12:19 AM
mathowie says:

this post is within about 1200 posts shy of the mark.

can you grab posts from the xml-rpc framework via postID?

» by mathowie on Feb 23, 2002 at 03:52 AM
aaron says:

I had an entry that was 2431 posts away. How exciting!

» by aaron on Feb 23, 2002 at 03:58 AM
mathowie says:

Luke was only 1700 away. It looks like it happened around 6am Pacific time, on friday. Maybe a few minutes shy of 6.

» by mathowie on Feb 23, 2002 at 04:03 AM
caroline says:

I had 10000530.

» by caroline on Feb 23, 2002 at 07:39 AM
tomcosgrave says:

The last post I made to my weblog was number 9980975 - 19,025 short of the mark.

» by tomcosgrave on Feb 23, 2002 at 08:46 AM
cheen says:
» by cheen on Feb 23, 2002 at 08:53 AM
Meg P says:

I managed to hit 10000271 (and also 9999542)

» by Meg P on Feb 23, 2002 at 09:21 AM
Rikard says:

Indeed how do you find out the number of a post? Tried to look in the archives but couldn't tell anything from them. Is it something you need to setup in the template?

» by Rikard on Feb 23, 2002 at 09:47 AM
kofi says:

Not that far off with 100000218. But no cigar.

» by kofi on Feb 23, 2002 at 10:31 AM
Dave says:

Closer still: 9999957. Maybe an eighth of a cigar?

» by Dave on Feb 23, 2002 at 11:15 AM
Adam Kalsey says:

Okay, I'll help those confused souls that don't understand how people know what post number they were.

Blogger assigns a unique number to each post. If you mouse over the edit link in the Blogger editor, the number after id= is the post number.

You can also add the <$BlogItemNumber$> tag to your template and that will be replaced with the post id.

That is also how Blogger users create permanant links to their posts. They add something like this to their Blogger template:

<a name="<$BlogItemNumber$>"></a>
<$BlogItemBody$>
<a href="<$BlogItemArchiveFileName$>#<$BlogItemNumber$>">link</a>

» by Adam Kalsey on Feb 23, 2002 at 11:42 AM
Adam Kalsey says:

I just emailed Ev and asked if he'd post and entry on Blogger to tell who did it.

» by Adam Kalsey on Feb 23, 2002 at 11:46 AM
caroline says:

My friend Hydragenic was very close: 9999923.

» by caroline on Feb 24, 2002 at 03:56 AM
anil says:

I had thought a few months ago about figuring out the timing frequency of milestone post numbers, and using that to try to hit close to 10 million or so, but the posting rates changed dramatically after september, and it would've been too hard to guess.

This is my elaborate way of confessing my sour grapes. The thing I lament is that now remembering post IDs is harder for doing comments and stuff, because the 7-digit numbers read like North American phone numbers.

» by anil on Feb 24, 2002 at 10:36 PM
Martin Conaghan says:

The part I'm concerned about, is that the more people Blog, the more these numbers are going to increase.

I'm not sure I like the idea of an archive page on my site with a link like:

http://www.copydesk.co.uk/archive/2002_02_24_index.shtml#100638722213445423457678995215500100135556211200203444011346783411

Why can't it just assign a number based a the user's Blogger ID combined with the date (or time) the entry was posted?

So, for example, if I posted at 10am on 25/2/2002, my link could be something like:

http://www.copydesk.co.uk/archive/2002_02_25_index.shtml#IDNUMBER+02251000

» by Martin Conaghan on Feb 25, 2002 at 04:14 AM
Hossein Sharifi says:

Out of curiosity, I queried the YACCS database to see if there was a comment on post #10M. Here are the 4 closest IDs I found: 9999983, 9999986, 10000009 ! (no permalink), and 10000014.

» by Hossein Sharifi on Feb 25, 2002 at 04:49 AM
Yardsale says:

I had 9976873 and 10032963.

» by Yardsale on Feb 25, 2002 at 11:34 AM
jkottke says:


The part I'm concerned about, is that the more people Blog, the more these numbers are going to increase.

Sure, but as the # of posts increases exponentially, the # of digits in the post id only increases linearly. 10,000,000 is 10 times 1,000,000, but only one digit longer.

» by jkottke on Feb 25, 2002 at 11:53 AM
Ev says:

And the winner is: http://www.blogger.com/news_archive.pyra?which=2002_02_01_news_archive.xml#10112810

» by Ev on Feb 25, 2002 at 02:38 PM
mal says:

If anyone's interested, I'm pretty sure those Yellow Pages ads were nicked from Viz Comic's site, viz.co.uk. Warning - if you're not familiar with Viz's output, expect some strong language (albeit in comic form). Also, if you want some background on Viz, a search on the BBC news site is always a good bet.

» by mal on Feb 25, 2002 at 05:52 PM
Saima says:
» by Saima on Feb 26, 2002 at 08:42 AM
Saima says:

See I thought I was being clever by typing in #10000000 at Blogdex but it seems I'm not because I didn't read the previous couple of posts. Ah well.

» by Saima on Feb 26, 2002 at 08:46 AM
Agent Vulga says:

I'm afraid it was me... And I did indeed nick the Yellow Pages ad thingy... Sorry!

Could have been a bit more exciting I know, but I didn't know I was doing it until it was done (does that make any sense?)
Well, thanx for looking! My website isn't really ready at all, and probably won't be until about April / May (too much to do at work!) but if you're interested, it at http://www.vulga.co.uk. And I'm trying to get some webspace sorted out, so I have somewhere to put it, and get rid of the annoying banners!

Cheerio!

Agent Vulga

» by Agent Vulga on Feb 26, 2002 at 09:17 AM
Stuy Parker says:

You're all sad.

» by Stuy Parker on Feb 27, 2002 at 06:44 PM
Agent Vulga says:

I'm only accidentally sad, I didn't ask for this!

» by Agent Vulga on Feb 28, 2002 at 02:13 PM

 
This thread is closed to new comments. Thanks to everyone who responded.

More about this page

This entry was published on February 22, 2002 at 04:12 pm.

kottke.org is a weblog about the liberal arts 2.0 edited by Jason Kottke since March 1998. You can read about me and kottke.org here. If you've got questions, concerns, or an interesting link for me, send them along. Here's the kottke.org RSS feed kottke.org RSS feed.

Advertisement

dot dot dot

Advertise on kottke.org via The Deck.

Looking for work? Tags, tags, tags!

Many posts on kottke.org have been "tagged" with keywords, which activity results in collections of related posts like sports, infoviz, or bestof.

Recently popular tags (last 3 weeks)

2008election   barackobama   video   politics   photography   movies   design   books   maps   music   nyc   remix   sports   food   finance

All-time popular tags

movies   photography   books   nyc   science   food   lists   design   business   sports   video   weblogs   music   bestof   art

Some of my favorite tags

photography   economics   lists   bestof   infoviz   food   nyc   firstworldproblems   cities   restaurants   video   timelapse   interviews   language   maps   fashion   nsfw   remix  

Random tags

sunshine   prison   cities   barcade   marypoppins   lifeafterpeople   realestate   cars   fundraising   hosseinderakhshan   fridakahlo   sony   pentagram   movies   im

kottke.org

You're visiting kottke.org. All content by Jason Kottke (contact me) unless otherwise noted, with some restrictions on its use. Good luck will come to those who dig around in the archives. If you've reached this point by accident, I suggest panic. In memory of DFW, rest in peace. Thanks for everything.