kottke.org home archives + xml about kottke.org contact me
kottke.org - home of fine hypertext products

The Passion of the Christ opens today,

The Passion of the Christ opens today, rating of 50 on Metacritic. Ebert loved it, gave it 4 stars, but called it the most violent movie he'd ever seen.

Reader Comments
21 comments
spygeek says:

My fiance saw it yesterday. His response? "I need therapy."

» by spygeek on Feb 25, 2004 at 11:15 AM
Bobby says:

I seriously can't wait to see this. And, on a side note, all this bad press is only going to pump up the box office sales even more. Being agnostic, I could care less who it offends, it's just a great story that needed to be made into a great movie.

» by Bobby on Feb 25, 2004 at 11:29 AM
soulonice says:

I can't wait to see this either. One of the local news stations had a bit piece about the movie and showed clips of people as they emerged from the darkened theatre, many were crying and most were visibly shaken.

» by soulonice on Feb 25, 2004 at 12:49 PM
John says:

The best review I've read yet was Ebert's. Definitely worth checking out. Is there a Kottke review coming soon?

» by John on Feb 25, 2004 at 02:23 PM
Fox Man says:

This movie sucked. Jesus is not the messiah. One lie filled movie based on another lie. When the true messiah of the Jews comes, he will surely be very angry. No one involved with this movie, the makers or the viewers, will go to heaven. The Lord, our G-d in heaven does not take lightly to those who do not favor Israel and the Israelites.

» by Fox Man on Feb 25, 2004 at 04:22 PM
patricia says:

I find it fascinating that people seem surprised that I'm not rushing to see this movie. Even people who know me well. I very rarely see movies that have a lot of violence in them. Somehow the fact that this is about Christ is supposed to make me overlook my extreme dislike of gore. I don't think so. Jesus or not, sitting in a dark movie theater watching someone get the crap beaten out of them is not my idea of a good time.

» by patricia on Feb 25, 2004 at 04:43 PM
Dave says:

What a rip off. The Wachowski brothers should sue.

» by Dave on Feb 25, 2004 at 06:10 PM
jonathan says:

patricia - I couldn't agree more. regardless of the subject matter, this just seems like indulgent, violent crap, and I can't fathom the public interest.

» by jonathan on Feb 26, 2004 at 12:18 AM
barlow says:

I didn't think it was more violent than Fight Club or more disturbing than Seven or Gangs of New York. I think Ebert is being a little hyperbolic. But anyone who goes to church once in a while has probably thought enough about what crucifixion and flogging would be like that it isn't a huge shock. Maybe I'm just a jaded Gen-Xer but again, I didn't think the violence was over the top. See the link to my blog for a fairly spoiler-filled review if you're interested.

» by barlow on Feb 26, 2004 at 01:48 AM
Kate says:

Spoiler? I'll give you a spoiler: pssst, Jesus dies in the end!

» by Kate on Feb 26, 2004 at 02:44 AM
Ruben says:

Prominent Israeli are afraid the movie could lead to a rise in anti-Semitism, for its harsh portrayal of Jews and their alleged blame for the death of Jesus.

» by Ruben on Feb 26, 2004 at 04:56 AM
Leif says:

Eh, Jesus was a Jewish heretic, of course many of them would have been happy if he died (that's another thing everyone's ignoring--Christians didn't see themselves as any different than Jews until about 60 years after Jesus' death). This is not really a good anaology, since the Church *was* responsible for killing him directly, but suppose Giordano Bruno was the focus of a major world religion today and Christians still nevertheless existed. If a movie about his death were made in this context, the same stuff would no doubt be thrown at Brunians by the Church.

» by Leif on Feb 26, 2004 at 12:17 PM
Dan says:

Actually, Kate, he seemingly doesn't. What do you think all this fuss has been about the past 2000 years?

» by Dan on Feb 26, 2004 at 04:00 PM
Dan says:

Also, I bet when google gets ahold of this thread, it will snowball into another matrix-type massive movie discussion thead.

» by Dan on Feb 26, 2004 at 04:01 PM
Leif says:

Dan, speaking of massive threads, check out the one at Fark. Totally out of control.

» by Leif on Feb 26, 2004 at 05:03 PM
matt says:

I agree with barlow. If you've been to Church or even glanced at the New Testament, "Passion" shouldn't be anything new to you. I don't think Mel Gibson (or for that matter, anyone involved in the making of the movie) intended the film to be on par with an action film in terms of violence, I think he merely tried to make it realistic. Whether you enjoy it or not, Jesus was crucified and beaten in a horrible manner. The movie isn't trying to overemphasize the violence, or glorify it. It's merely trying to provide a clearer picture of what happened. A visual representation of events is often easier to understand than a dry textbook explanation.

» by matt on Feb 26, 2004 at 06:46 PM
Leif says:

Exactly, we're talking about the same people (the Romans, mind you), who crucified Spartacus' entire army and lined them along the Appian Way. Brutal indeed.

» by Leif on Feb 26, 2004 at 06:58 PM
Gummi says:

Yeah Leif, but in the case of Spartacus a bunch of his friends stood up and said. "I'm Spartacus". I don't recollect Jesus' friends standing up and saying, "Crucify Me".

» by Gummi on Feb 26, 2004 at 08:13 PM
leon says:

Very tough movie to watch, but very worthwhile. If for nothing else than the (hopefully civil) discussion it should bring about. I found it quite moving.

» by leon on Feb 26, 2004 at 09:58 PM
spygeek says:

Dan: If you believe in such things, Jesus did, in fact, die. It was the rising from the grave bit that freaked everyone out.

» by spygeek on Feb 26, 2004 at 10:47 PM
shannon says:

I agree with Matt. I don't believe this movie is meant to be "entertaining". The point of the movie is for every human being to actually come close to realizing what Jesus did for us, and if you think about it, we're the ones that actually crucified him, if you get what i'm saying.

» by shannon on Feb 27, 2004 at 11:58 AM

 
This thread is closed to new comments. Thanks to everyone who responded.

More about this page

This entry was published on February 25, 2004 at 09:19 am.

kottke.org is a weblog about the liberal arts 2.0 edited by Jason Kottke since March 1998. You can read about me and kottke.org here. If you've got questions, concerns, or an interesting link for me, send them along. Here's the kottke.org RSS feed kottke.org RSS feed.

Advertisement

dot dot dot

Advertise on kottke.org via The Deck.

Looking for work?
kottke.org

You're visiting kottke.org. All content by Jason Kottke (contact me) unless otherwise noted, with some restrictions on its use. Good luck will come to those who dig around in the archives. If you've reached this point by accident, I suggest panic. In memory of DFW, rest in peace. Thanks for everything.