I got my copy of Jaguar from Amazon about, what, 2 weeks after everyone else did (boo Amazon!) and installed it with little delay. So far I like what I see a lot, tons of little improvements here and there and a big speed difference on my iBook.
Windows scroll faster, Web pages render faster, apps launch quicker.
iChat is interesting, but I'm probably going to switch back to Adium soon for their richer feature set.
I'm not using the Address Book or Mail because I've got Entourage. The brushed aluminum look of iChat, iTunes, & Quicktime, et. al. is bugging me...I prefer the striped grey lines. I might have to install Metallifizer (thx jf) to bring that soothing grey to all of my Cocoa apps.
The sharing with my Linux box via Samba seems smoother.
Smoother? Fonts? Yes. Nice.

My favorite little tweak is the flattening of all the form elements: buttons, pulldowns, scrollbars, &c. It's such a tiny improvement, but they were just too 3-D and gaudy before; they dialed it down just enough to fix it.
Sherlock 3 is a bit of a disappointment. The flight tracking and yellow pages are nice, but the movie listings are inferior to those of Watson. And I want a stand alone maps feature, not just directions to businesses through the yellow pages.
Anything else I should be noticing/checking out with Jaguar?
(And I apologize for the title of the post.)
Also being able to send contacts direct from Address Book to my phone via Bluetooth is cool - at least until iSync arrives!
I'm stunningly pissed off with Sherlock. It's completely and utterly useless if you're outside the US.
However, as for other features of 10.2: while I like iChat, why exactly did they make it so useless? You can't make the entry area bigger than 1 line and change; finding out how to set or change your own buddy icon is annoying (I would never have thought to set it in the Address Book); sending files to other users requires a Direct Connect (which I HATE), et cetera, ad nauseum. I will continue to use it for now in hopes that Apple will soon make an update for it. I hope I'm not waiting in vain. (I also hope I don't have to wait for 10.3. ;))
I actually like Sherlock 3, but the yellow pages are a bit useless as far as maps go. Even a "Find this on a mapping site" link beside each entry would be nice.
I'm also noticing the little speed touches here and there; however, I notice Office v.X is still kind of slow. That might be due to my having 128 MB of RAM, the minimum amount to run it.
And Adam: no, no I don't. But I didn't pay for it, really; I bought an iBook at the local Apple Store and they gave it to me for free. I don't think it's $129 worth of nice, but it's a nice upgrade nonetheless if you can afford it.
I did not purchase my copy of 10.2 either, and I'm rather glad that I didn't. While I appreciate that I no longer have to tell my computer where I am connecting from, be it work or home, where I live this isn't really a selling feature- businesses who have large networks and want to integrate their Mac and PC systems, well, this upgrade is really for them and the problem with that is that most businesses that use macs are graphics houses and they aren't switching over to 10 any time soon, due to lack of printer support (still), the non-existent Adobe Type Manager (Font Suitcase? Please, give me a break!), and the lack of most 3rd party plugin support for programs like Adobe Photoshop (still). I fear only geeks like me (I literally squealed with delight when I set up my mac-pc network at home in literally five minutes) will appreciate this feature for some time.
Another little qualm that I have? Well, it isn't necessarily with 10.2 so much as it is with Roxio, Norton and Wacom. With 10.2 I can no longer mount a .toast file (i.e. a disk image) - all I get is a Mac OS -20 error and a lot of grief. I can no longer use Norton Anti-Virus (I'm not buying Virex, thanks) until an upgrade is release. And my Wacom drivers, working so wonderfully under 10.1.3 through 10.1.5, won't even load and often hang up my system on startup.
...sigh...
I'm hoping that 10.2.1 (beta testing still) will fix a lot of these problems and Roxio and the rest of them will get on the ball with new upgrades).
And for those installing 10.2 for the first time, I would definitely recommend chosing the "Archive and Install" option. I upgraded initially, but noticed a few odd quirks I couldn't get rid off. So I reinstalled but chose the aforementioned option this time. Everything is perfect, and I could be crazy, but faster as well. (and yes, I was able to do an archive and install even with 10.2 already on the machine).
[ Command-shift-4 = crosshair selection ]
[ + spacebar = selective window ]
more info here
Do you have any information on that, a link? When I switched to OS X from the PC, I upgraded from PS5.5 to PS7 and while the text tools are improved, there's something about the aliasing and anti-aliasing that bugged me.
The iBooks just aren't really designed for pro users. A 500 mhz TiBook is going to outperform the fastest iBook simply due to the G4/Altivec architecture.
I was already to get an iBook a few weeks ago, but I had 4 people talk me out of it. So now I'm forking out a bit more for the 667 TiBook, and, to be honest, I think it is the better solution (the TiBook will last me longer as a productive tool).
One small bonus to my new government gig is that Apple offers gov employee discounts. Yea me.
And Jason, I concur that the removal of one 'layer' of eye candy is just about right. I hope that's a sign that they are slowly getting back in line with their past expertise in human factors now that they got the bells and whistles out of their system.
http://www.arstechnica.com/reviews/02q3/macosx-10.2/macosx-10.2-13.html#terminal"
Also: love the less-3d-than-before buttons. mm-mm. can't wait for iCal and iSync.
also: Ken Bereskin, the Mac OS X Product Manager, has a weblog and he's doing a new feature a day. lot's of little tips an tricks. Today's feature involves mounting an FTP server in the finder (now that's what i call 'very cool'): http://radio.weblogs.com/0100676/
I'm liking it. Those things, plus the usual suspects- Sherlock, speed (especially booting) even on my "vintage" PBG4 500, FTP mounting, and seemless cross-platform sharing (woohooo!) make me anyway a happy customer. Yeah, I paid for 10.1 (and 10.0, and beta), and so I wasn't too pleased to be forkin' it over yet again, but it IS a strong upgrade that i can honestly has upped my productivity- and comfort, since last weekend when I installed it.
That said, it hosed my custom build of PHP + MYSQL + PHPMYADMIN on my Apache, which took an embarrassingly long time to install. Oh well...
ed f: you can use the "DigitalColor Meter" (in Utilities) to zoom pixels and demonstrate that blacks aren't black. You can turn this off by going to the "General" menu item in Preferences and choosing the "Standard" font smoothing style.
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/DOWNLOAD/OFFICEX/palmsync.asp
Although you'll need to install office service release 1 before you do so. Careful - it needs a new serial.
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/DOWNLOAD/OFFICEX/OfficeX_SR1.asp
Other features I like:
1. Apple-tab switches to the last app you were in, instead of reading left to right on the dock. Great for toggling.
2. When you're in an open or save screen, you can drag a directory or file onto the screen to automatically change to that directory. This exists in 10.1, but Jaguar also selects the file instead of just going to the directory. Good for "browse" boxes for uploading onto websites.
You're using Samba to share files with your Linux box? Really?
Well, don't. Mac OS X and Linux are both UNIX variants - so why not use UNIX tools to share files (instead of forcing both to use the crippling, Kafkaesque Windows protocol)?
Use NFS. Here's a HOWTO to get you started:
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/NFS-HOWTO/intro.html#SCOPE
Bon apetite!
Another issue that deserves attention: for those of you with the older graphite AirPort base stations, if you do an "upgrade" version of the Jaguar install, you may experience the same dropped-IP problems that plagued AirPort 2.0.4. This only makes sense, seeing as how a new OS would certainly install the newest version of AirPort, but it doesn't fix the problem.
(For those of you who don't know what I'm talking about, AirPort 2.0.4 was intended for the newer "snow" base stations, and owners of the older "graphite" base stations that unwittingly installed 2.0.4 over 2.0.2 suddenly found themselves having to restart their base stations every five minutes. To add further insult to injury, in a shockingly Microsoftian move, Apple wouldn't let you uninstall 2.0.4 and reinstall 2.0.2 by the conventional methods; any attempt to reinstall 2.0.2 would result in a chirpy "You don't need this!" error, no matter how hard you tried to weed out all the AirPort software from your machine, and there's no automatic uninstall script that I could find.)
In an effort to undo this dilemma, I found a user-written AppleScript online that would roll the AirPort software back to 2.0.2 (a solution that worked perfectly when I'd accidentally upgraded to 2.0.4 back under 10.1). Imagine my horror when, after rebooting, my PBG4 no longer recognized its AirPort card. The Network control panel grayed out AirPort, claiming that the necessary hardware was absent, and nothing I could do would bring it back. Finally, I groaned and decided to reinstall Jaguar to try and get all the 2.0.4 widgets back and just live with the five-minute rule. This time, however, I did the "archive and install" method, and wham! AirPort under Jaguar now works flawlessly with my base station. And, like Todd says, I think a number of other little glitches have been fixed, too -- although for some reason it keeps forgetting some of my application preferences, which is mildly disturbing.
Anyway, the moral of this story: archive and install, baby. Archive and install.
Nicest thing so far are the little Memory Stick and Compact Flash card icons in the Finder.
Back in November of 2001, when Apple and Microsoft were both just getting going with their wacky new goober-interfaces, I made a prediction:
I predict that both Microsoft's Luna interface for Windows XP and Apple's Aqua interface for Mac OS X, will be toned down in subsequent versions (particularly in terms of color and complexity). This may take at least two versions to come about.
Now, to wait for Microsoft to do its part...
perhaps the first iteration was a "bug?"
Still not appreciating the "column" view— and especially not appreciating the save and open mandatory column view.
I have no strange colors associated with the anti-aliasing on my CRTs. I'm curious if it's an LCD problem.
Lastly, and I'm sure I'm not alone, has anyone else been able to use Illustrator 10 on a machine slower than a 667Mhz? It is so slow, so totally unusable on my 450Mhz that I continue to use 9... which is irritating since there are some very nice things about 10.
http://www.arstechnica.com/reviews/02q3/macosx-10.2/macosx-10.2-6.html
Sure, they look good, and I'm fairly convinced that they're good machines.
But let's face it, they're expensive and extravagant toys. Anything you can do on a Mac, can be achieved just as easily (if not better) on a generic, cheaper PC.
Additionally, less than 4 per cent of people accesing the internet do so on a Mac - for fairly obvious reasons: even the best Mac browsers have trouble with the most basic HTML.
I just don't get it.
Someone explain it to me.
Please.
I'm so relieved someone has mentioned the arrow. I keep looking at and wondering if there is actually something different about it or if I'm just going mad. Now I can save mad for another day.
I'm fairly sure this was covered on the Siracusa Ars Technica article that's already been mentioned a couple of times. Yes, it's long, but you really should read it.
This thread is closed to new comments. Thanks to everyone who responded.

