US Open champ Roger Federer could be greatest player everSEP 14 2004

US Open champ Roger Federer could be greatest player ever. He's got lots of strengths and no major weaknesses.

There are 6 reader comments

Robert46 14 200411:46AM

I think he's good. But such a title ought to go to someone who has dominated for far longer than he has.

Matt53 14 200411:53AM

I was about to post that exact thing, Robert. He's just starting to "bear fruit" so to speak. No doubt he is an exceptional player. In my personal opinion, it's going to require years of Sampras-like total (mental, physical) domination of the courts to have the title "greatest ever".

Logically speaking, the author allows for this but it seems like a bit of "fanboyism". Polished player, yes. Greatest ever, only time will tell.

Matt14 14 200412:14PM

I think the author's suggesting that Federer could be the greatest player ever if he maintains this form over the next 5 to 10 years, rather than saying he could be the greatest player now. I think there's two ways to read that headline.

Robert23 14 200412:23PM

His sub-header is a better clue to where he's at.

Sunny32 14 2004 8:32PM

What's even sad is that the only person who gave him a run for his money entire tournament was 34 year old Andre Agassi. What does that say abt Andre?

Dinu22 15 2004 1:22AM

Seconding the post of Matt.... err, the second Matt... so I'm seconding the second Matt I suppose.

This doesn't seem like "fanboyism" as the first matt said. In fact, I'd say the author does a pretty thorough job of evaluating Federer's game at this stage and evaluating those who are labelled the giants of the game. I mean, his evaluations of Lendl, Sampras, and Agassi (greats who I watched through most of their carrers) certainly ring true to me.

Fanboyism denotes a certain irrational fanaticism to me, which seems rather unfounded in this case. From all the talk I've heard from experts, and from watching his game numerous times, he does seem like an unprecedented talent. Seeing him just dominate his peers reminds me of when Tiger burst onto the scene a few year's back, or when I used to watch Gretzky kate across the ice as if everyone else was in slow-motion.

He just seems to be operating on a higher level (both mentally and physically) than anyone else out there.

This thread is closed to new comments. Thanks to everyone who responded.

kottke.org

Front page
About + contact
Site archives

Subscribe

Follow kottke.org on Twitter

Follow kottke.org on Tumblr

Like kottke.org on Facebook

Subscribe to the RSS feed

Sponsored by

Ads by The Deck

Support kottke.org shop at Amazon

And more at Amazon.com

Looking for work?

More listings on the Job Board

 

Happy Cog Hosting