kottke.org home archives + xml about kottke.org contact me
kottke.org - home of fine hypertext products

Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson's boob

Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson's boob. A mistake? I think not...unless Janet normally wears pasties on her nipples.

Reader Comments
106 comments
stella says:

And here I thought I was seeing things...

» by stella on Feb 01, 2004 at 11:37 PM
cheapbastard says:

Is this even a story?

» by cheapbastard on Feb 02, 2004 at 12:10 AM
JC says:

Are you sure that's a pasty? Looks like some very uncomfortable, star-shaped, heavy piercing. (yes, I looked more than once).

» by JC on Feb 02, 2004 at 12:18 AM
freon says:

not a pasty actually. check it out here
i think it's a cool piece of jewelry

» by freon on Feb 02, 2004 at 12:21 AM
donald tetto says:

What got me was how very determined Justin looks right before doing it. Yeah, an accident. The metafilter thread on the matter sums it up pretty nicely: boobs, but no "controversial" political ads. Love that mass media.

» by donald tetto on Feb 02, 2004 at 12:32 AM
Alex says:

Step 1: Vote out Bush
Step 2: Kick Colin Powell's son out of the FCC
Step 3: Rescind CBS's license to broadcast on public airwaves

» by Alex on Feb 02, 2004 at 12:45 AM
josh says:

i'd like to think it's their little way of protesting cbs's handling of moveon.org. probably not, but it'd be funny.

» by josh on Feb 02, 2004 at 01:07 AM
Charles says:

According to this story, Timberlake and CBS are both claiming it was just an accident - or to use their terminology - a "wardrobe malfunction."

» by Charles on Feb 02, 2004 at 01:09 AM
yi says:

it's a total coverup. all american news sources are reporting it as an accident, but according to foreign news cbs knew about it beforehand and issued an apology only after receiving complaints from viewers.

if anyone watched it, it was CLEARLY part of the performance. i find it odd that cbs would approve of a bare breast yet ban the bush ad.

» by yi on Feb 02, 2004 at 01:34 AM
Matt says:

You can buy a thing just like janet's here, scroll down to "nipple shields #1"

» by Matt on Feb 02, 2004 at 01:57 AM
Vegard says:

"nipple shield"... hehe...

» by Vegard on Feb 02, 2004 at 02:25 AM
Mike says:

Breast but no bush?

» by Mike on Feb 02, 2004 at 06:41 AM
ChicagoTex says:

I came across this little animation of the the stunt. Yep. Obviously staged.

» by ChicagoTex on Feb 02, 2004 at 06:51 AM
James Roberts says:

Well according to BBC.co.uk, the performance was produced by MTV. The same network that gave us the Britney-Madonna kiss.

Of course both MTV and CBS are owned by the same company, so it isn't all together suprising.

» by James Roberts on Feb 02, 2004 at 08:02 AM
jGregor says:

This photo looks like some bad Edwina Scissorboobs meets randy college dolt imitation. Do TV creatives (or uncreatives) really believe this is the pinnacle of sports entertainment? And I don't think we really need (or want) to see naked Jackson flesh at this point in time...trial and all. But at least Justin is over 18.

» by jGregor on Feb 02, 2004 at 09:43 AM
Mike says:

Cheap publicity stunt to boost flagging careers. Well, Janet's anyway.

» by Mike on Feb 02, 2004 at 10:58 AM
Cory says:

Kinda funny that Janet Jackson & Justin Timberlake get all the comments when the Helmut Newton tribute below gets nothin'.

To me, Newton's work still is shocking, especially compared to what went down on the Superbowl halftime show.

» by Cory on Feb 02, 2004 at 11:04 AM
Dave L says:

Publiity stunts are just part of the industry. I posted a fun article about this and other historical publicity stunts here. It also has an animated version of the "costume malfunction" when you click on the link of the same name. Decide for yourself if you think it was planned.

» by Dave L on Feb 02, 2004 at 12:56 PM
Dave L says:

For some reason the link didn't show the first time. Maybe if I try again ... Article on Publicity Stunts

» by Dave L on Feb 02, 2004 at 12:59 PM
ChicagoTex says:

It appears they pulled the animation I had up earlier, so I uploaded it to my own server.

» by ChicagoTex on Feb 02, 2004 at 01:02 PM
spygeek says:

Unless she has nipples of iron, I find it unlikely that Janet would have been wearing that nipple shield "just because". It would have been too easy for it to get caught on her costume when she was dancing. I know people who tape their stuff down to prevent that.

Personally, I think it intentionally obscures the nipple just enough that the pictures are okay for the media to show.

» by spygeek on Feb 02, 2004 at 02:27 PM
tom says:

What I found more eerie was the "clockwork orange" costuming of her droog-like dance 'posse' while she was clad in a female version of pinhead's outfit.

» by tom on Feb 02, 2004 at 03:03 PM
Stephen says:

You noticed that too?! Nothing like a little ultra-violence to make Justin's grab all the more agressive.

» by Stephen on Feb 02, 2004 at 03:50 PM
ben says:

Isn't Janet getting a bit old for these antics? She does take good care of herself, but I thought she would show more tact in front of a national audience. Will she be the main event again or was this her last hurrah. Contrast this crap with Whitney Houston's pregame performance of the "Star Spangled Banner" in 1991.

» by ben on Feb 02, 2004 at 03:56 PM
Scott says:

Did anyone notice the SNAPS on her outfit? Check out the close up that FREON linked to above. Accident huh?

» by Scott on Feb 02, 2004 at 04:02 PM
nonogirl says:

and if it were an accident wouldn't she be trying to CONCEAL that breast immediately after the clothing was torn off?

» by nonogirl on Feb 02, 2004 at 04:17 PM
monkeyinabox says:

Atleast Janet showed us something of hers we haven't seen before. Rhythm Nation? That's like so 15 years ago.

» by monkeyinabox on Feb 02, 2004 at 05:44 PM
padraigin says:

Thank god I'm not the only one who fixated on the Clockwork Orange Dancers. Clear-cut proof that TPTB at Viacom/CBS are complete incompetents. I sincerely wish to believe that someone at MTV is laughing their asses off about that.

» by padraigin on Feb 02, 2004 at 06:30 PM
sarah says:

None of this would be a problem if it was considered okay to show breasts.

» by sarah on Feb 03, 2004 at 12:05 PM
Lunx says:

Nipple-SHEILD? It looks more like a gasket! Cheers to Tom for pointing out the drooges. Sort of bordered on the Weimar Republic meets Stanley Kubrick kind of thing. And dippy Justin posing as a frat boy feeling up his Aircraft Maintenance prof! HAH! I was more offended by the crass advertising, bad choreography and Kid Rock than anything else!

» by Lunx on Feb 03, 2004 at 10:14 PM
April says:

my husband would like to see a close up picture so that he can decide for himslef whether or not is the real thing can anyone help me

» by April on Feb 03, 2004 at 10:22 PM
Kyle Froyen says:

hey wold any one know where I could get pic of Janet Jackson. If so E-mail me. titans_are_us@hotmail.com

» by Kyle Froyen on Feb 03, 2004 at 10:23 PM
jenafir says:

All those idiots screaming that the Super Bowl is a family event, but why are the cheerleaders almost naked?And they are dressed like that the whole season. Geez, what hypocrits. And BUSH RULES!!!!!!

» by jenafir on Feb 03, 2004 at 11:00 PM
Supaman says:

I don't know, I kind of like seeing a rebel show there bare breast on the highest rated national television event of the year. I think its great for business. AND BUSH RULES!!!!!!!!!

» by Supaman on Feb 03, 2004 at 11:05 PM
jenafir says:

And by the way, it is not illegal for a woman to go topless in New York. I know this was in Texas, but isn't Texas known for Big things??? and that was one big-ass nippler!!! hehehe

» by jenafir on Feb 03, 2004 at 11:15 PM
CARLOS says:

JANET JACKSON IS HOT , I LOVE HER BOOBS, I THINK IT WAS KOOL WHAT SHE DID

» by CARLOS on Feb 04, 2004 at 09:34 AM
pdxhottie says:

Bush sucks.
That being said, the nipple shield was really bad ass looking and I can't find it anywhere now. (Ironic that I bought one similar like a year ago...outdated now?? Hmmm)
Everyone's outrage over the whole incident is lame. It's a nipple. We all have them. Some ppl need to pull the metaphorical (or literal) sticks out of their butts and get over it. My only problem is that if I was to show my nipple to 85 million ppl, there wouldn't be an "investigation". They'd haul my butt to jail so fast, the nipple shield would still be spinning on the stage.

» by pdxhottie on Feb 04, 2004 at 01:18 PM
derbyann says:

I think it was done to take the heat off her brother for awhile!

» by derbyann on Feb 04, 2004 at 03:24 PM
Biff says:

pdxhottie hates bush.....? WOW, pretty surprising from the most socialist state of the union. One of the top five in highest taxes. But regardless of what he/she/Pat? thinks..... I do have two points of view..... Yes I agree with pdxhottie, it is just a nipple, no big deal there. People should be more upset with the representation that tells people it is ok for a guy to rip off a womans shirt in public. What's that show? It's one thing if she exposes it herself, her body/her choice. But having Justin tear it off put's a different meaning behind it, after all it is her body not his. People today can get a harassment charge at work for telling a bad joke, but is it ok to lift up a gal's shirt and say "what's the big deal it's just a boob."

» by Biff on Feb 04, 2004 at 05:11 PM
Bobby Doofuss says:

I think the whole thing was set up. I think they knew it was going to cause confusion. How easy is it to say I sorry after you done something you did intentionally?

» by Bobby Doofuss on Feb 04, 2004 at 09:02 PM
u got it all wrong says:

I don't know but looking at Janet's face after the "accident" it looks quite shocked, but at the same time waring that "boo-shield"... Some got frustrated, others got excited... I think it was a good spice for the Super Ball and the media. Sometimes It's good to hear (see) stuff like that..
Don't u think?

» by u got it all wrong on Feb 04, 2004 at 10:19 PM
Kristina R. says:

I think everyone needs to just get over it...It was a fucking BOOB .....w/ what a little piece of jewelry on it. Who gives a shit if it was intended or not. No one made a big deal of Little Kim's leaf cover nipple outfit at the MTV music videos. But since it's Janet Jackson and at the "superbowl" they have to make a big ass deal out of nothing. And everyone is saying "oh it was intentional that's wrong blah blah" Dude shut the hell up and get on w/ your lives you act like you've never seen a damn tit before. All this time wasted on this ridiculous situation it's like we've just got another terrorist threat or something....what I'm trying to say is that this whole situation is way blown out of proportion and what happend happend get over it already. The performance was great the superbowl was good. Stop fixating your time/life on Janet Jackson's breast. It's rather inconsequential, obviously it's clear that half of America has nothing better to do then waste their time on bullshit. It's not like she was inconspicuous 'cause she was perfoming and everyone was paying attention to her but it's clear to me that by the look of shock on her and Justin's faces that it was not intentional. And people just need to give them a break and get on w/ their lives...........

» by Kristina R. on Feb 05, 2004 at 02:12 AM
ISCHAMAL says:

WHEN I DIE, I WANT TO COME BACK AS A WHITE MAN. ANYTHING A WHITE MAN DOES SEXUALLY ARE ACCEPTED BY AMERICANS.
WHITE MEN RULES. YOU GO JUSTIN. IF A MAN SNATCHED A VAIL OFF A YOUNG LADY IN MY COUNTY, HE IS WIPPED AND STONED.
COMING BACK AS A WHITE MAN IS A GREATER THAN THAN HAVING A THOUSAND VIRGINS. I COULD ONLY ENJOY A THOUSAND
VIRGINS, WITH THE WHITE MAN AMERICAN MADE VIAGRA IN MY SYSTEM. YOU GO JUSTIN. YOU ARE COMPLETEY INOCENT.
HANG JANET. STONE JANET. JUSTIN IS INOCENT. JUSTIN IS A WHITE MAN. INDECENT EXPOSURE LAWS IN AMERICA DON'T APPLY
TO WHITE MEN. WHITE MEN RULE.

» by ISCHAMAL on Feb 05, 2004 at 09:07 AM
Larry M says:

Jeeeez! What an amazing country! Washington calls for an "investigation" when Janet's 'BOOB' is exposed on TV. (*And a mighty fine boob it is, by the way!) We cannot, however, have an "investigation" of that moronic 'BOOB' in the White House whose misleading statements and lies have an average of one American soldier DIE every day in Iraq! Just another wonderful conservative overreaction - emphasis on the "con." GOD ALMIGHTY, PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!

» by Larry M on Feb 05, 2004 at 09:18 AM
Brenda says:

I think that the exposure was a cheap publicity stunt, but what is even worse is that the public plays into it. It wouldn't give her any publicity if we didnt talk about it. What's even worse, most people dont think its a big deal to show a boob on TV to an event that CHILDREN were watching.

» by Brenda on Feb 05, 2004 at 09:53 AM
Steven says:

Boobs are out , boobs are in! In holland in a city not far away from Amsterdam there's an exibiton on barbie dolls this week. There in chrono order. And wat do you see? Barbie boobs getting bigger, boobs getting smaller. Ken's lowerhalf is flat Ken's got a willy! What I'm trying to say here is, that in 5 years or so, boobs on tv in America will be as normal as they are now in holland for some years now. Janet's album is coming out and this will have the calculated effect. It's as simple as that. One more thing, why is it that a country who produces so much porn (adult entertainment) get's so hung up over an exposed breast! thank you.

» by Steven on Feb 05, 2004 at 11:25 AM
ANITA F. CROOK says:

I THINK THAT WE AS A SOCIETY ARE BLOWING THE JANET JACKSON INCIDENT OUT OF CONTROL. EVERYONE INCLUDING INFANTS HAVE SEEN BREAST BEFORE, EVEN IF THEY DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE LOOKING AT. BUT HOW MANY PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD HAVE SEEN TWO WOMEN TONGUE KISSING ON PUBLIC TELEVISION LIKE MADONNA AND BRITTANY SPEARS. WE AS AFRICAN AMERICAN NEED TO STAND BEHIND JANET AND DO LIKE MARTIN LUTHER KING DID FOR ROSA PARKS, BOYCOTT THE GRAMMY AND LET THEM KNOW THAT WE AS A RACE OF PEOPLE WILL NOT STAND FOR THEIR DOUBLE STANDARDS ANYMORE.

» by ANITA F. CROOK on Feb 05, 2004 at 11:31 AM
ashley p says:

oh my god people just get over it so they showed her boob who wouldn't want to see janet jackon's tit. i know i didn't mind seeing it so stop making a big deal out of it no one talk shit about how you do things....

» by ashley p on Feb 05, 2004 at 12:37 PM
SPC Haun jonathan says:

who care my god its not like 90% of the people havent seen boobs. get over it and move on just drop it. this is nothing, you have people overseas i think their more of an issue than her boob.

» by SPC Haun jonathan on Feb 05, 2004 at 12:42 PM
S.W. Adams says:

The point is, what does this kind of crap have to do with the Super Bowl? Or, for that matter, anything connected with Football? Let's face it; it was a lousy half-time (but then, most of the NFL "extravaganza" types are). The average game watcher is interested in 22 men battling it out, just this side of illegal shots (see: "smashmouth football"). If we want to see some suductive, scantilly clad females, we only have to look on the sidelines; they're beautiful, there for us, and don't feel the need to rip off half their top to "shock us". Yes, it's just a boob. We've all seen them; I'm partial to them, myself. But this kind of performance is the culmination of what's happened to Superbowl Halftimes for the last few years (yes, I'm including the friend to all kiddies, Michael Jackson). Let's face it; money talks. So perhaps now, with CBS in the target, and everybody saying "this isn't what was told to us would happen...Sure...I play Santa Claus, but I don't live at the North Pole.

Maybe we can get back to using that time-slot to honor past players who have made significant contribuitions to the game. Or, what the hell...I can always mute it, and get things done so I can catch the 3rd Quarter kickoff.

» by S.W. Adams on Feb 05, 2004 at 02:55 PM
Doug S. says:

Just wanted to prove that it is accually possible to complete a sentence without using the words, "like" or "way". Where are are the women-libbers who should be raising the roof over the implication that it's alright for a man to tear off a woman's clothes. Have we regressed to the 1950's. That's like way uncool, Dude!!!

» by Doug S. on Feb 05, 2004 at 03:16 PM
Doug S. says:

HEY ANITA CROOK...WANT A HOT NEWS FLASH? EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD DOES NOT HAVE TO DO WITH RACE. THE ISSUE WOULD HAVE BEEN THE SAME IF BRITTNEY SPEARS HAD DONE IT. YOU SHOULDN'T QUOTE DR. KING AND STILL BE A RACIST. GROW UP AND GET A LIFE.

» by Doug S. on Feb 05, 2004 at 03:22 PM
SW says:

You all are so simply minded and need to get a life. Judge what your showing your own children. If showing of her boob destroyed your childs image, than the problem is at home. You should be the example, not a 2 second boob shot!!!!!Children are being abused everyday, people are dieing from cancer, Aids and other diseases, there is so many more things that are important in this world than a 2sec revealing of a boob. If you were so much against it why are you replaying it continously on the news giving people something to talk about. For those against it is probably closed minded people who feel they stuff dont stank and they are perfect. You can not judge anything because you think! it was intentional. Janet dont need stunts to be recognized. Her beauty, talent and name will carry her where she want to go. As for banning her from the grammys, and trying to make you pay a fine. a fine for what? Its Janet Jackson, if anything you should be paying her to see her tits. If you dont realize she brought the tv ratings sky high, while your playing. Have you ever heard of any other half time so spoken upon?
ALso have anyone ever thought maybe she was a little embarrased? Oh I guess cause she's a Jackson she suppose to be okay with it.

» by SW on Feb 05, 2004 at 04:18 PM
PissedOff says:

-sighs- It's only a nipple for crying out loud! You all have them! I don't really see the big deal. I have nipples, you have nipples, kids have nipples, even my friggin' cat has nipples. Sheesh. Okay, so maybe it was uncalled for, but have you seen some of the music videos they show on MTV recently? They are like soft porn with all those women girating around wearing next to nothing.

» by PissedOff on Feb 05, 2004 at 04:22 PM
PissedOff says:

And Britney, Britney sucks balls. I swear it. Janet rocks. She is far more talented than Shitney, oops, I mean Britney.

» by PissedOff on Feb 05, 2004 at 04:29 PM
Chelsey Snead says:

hey i dont think it was an accident i think that justin was planning to do that. Because how did he no that Janet wore plasties i mean come on probably Janet has enjoyed that little moment i mean y hadnt she covered it up. Now next superbowl we have to watch a stupid marching band perform oooooo yeah. Now ever since that event happened i doubt if MTV is ever goign to b at the superbowl. hey stupid (Justin) thanks alot now MTV cant b on the superbowl ne more.

» by Chelsey Snead on Feb 05, 2004 at 05:01 PM
CandiGirl says:

holy shit!! why is everyone paying so much g-d attention to this!!! WE SAW JANETS BOOB BIG DEAL!! As far as im concerned.. it was very disapointing... i thought Janet had much NICEr boobs than that *gag*

» by CandiGirl on Feb 05, 2004 at 06:10 PM
Brownie says:

Get Over It. We have all seen and done worse.

» by Brownie on Feb 05, 2004 at 06:47 PM
RAQUEL says:

IT WASN'T A PASTY ON HER BOOBAGE, IT WAS RIGGED AND I KNOW IT GO TO DRUDGEREPORT .COM AND LOOK FOR JANETS BOOBEY THEY SHOW THE WHOLE THING. SHES A LIEAH

» by RAQUEL on Feb 05, 2004 at 08:07 PM
johnathen says:

i think janet did something nasty so janet go to my room and have sex hoo remember your tasles babe yum yum sex with you any tim

» by johnathen on Feb 05, 2004 at 08:26 PM
TheCatMan says:

Nice titty!

» by TheCatMan on Feb 05, 2004 at 09:27 PM
ChicagoTex says:

Heh, sorry, but I took the Janet strip animation gif off. Too many people were linking it (over 300) and I wasn't getting accurate visit statistics. If you want the file for your own site, just contact me and I'll send it to you so you can bring joy to the masses once again.

» by ChicagoTex on Feb 05, 2004 at 10:07 PM
Roy says:

The poor guy got over excited and accidently pulled off half her shirt i mean who wouldn't it janet jackson for cruying out loud!!!!!

» by Roy on Feb 06, 2004 at 12:48 AM
Mom says:

Justin Timberlake stated he's appauled because FAMILY's were watching, does he think dirty dancing and grabbing her ass is o.k for kids?

» by Mom on Feb 06, 2004 at 01:21 AM
Ralph says:

NFL players ought to slap up that twigy boy Justin Timberlake. Worst Superbowl halftime show EVER! Federal Government should throw the book at her, the show sucked so bad, not for the peirced nipple I could care less. If I was a NFL player I'd slap that little white bitch for trying to upstage their honored and hardfought game the Superbowl. GREAT SUPERBOWL, by the way.

» by Ralph on Feb 06, 2004 at 02:13 AM
a-ahahahah says:

I didn't see the game. I don't watch MTV. The world is perverted. I only care what goes on in my home. I am not a prude or anything. It would be alot easier if everyone walked around naked and made love in the public.

» by a-ahahahah on Feb 06, 2004 at 10:15 AM
hippies rule says:

I wish we can all just fly back to the 70's. MTV is the one that really messed up the whole world.

» by hippies rule on Feb 06, 2004 at 10:18 AM
larry says:

I love all of ths close up shots that I have of Janet's great looking boobs and nice looking nipple. She is one hot lady and I wish I could have the chance to pull off both sides and check them out if she would let me.

» by larry on Feb 06, 2004 at 10:20 AM
PissedOff says:

And black people do not suck. I won't get into it because I will get flamed so badly, but black people helped to bring up the world. I could start cussing off white people because Justin was the one who ripped the god damn top off! But you don't see me cussing, apart from Britney. And yeah, MTV has polluted all of your minds. It's sick how so much flesh is revealed to children of such a young age; they don't need to see some woman winding her batty up and down on a guy!
Justin Timberlak needs a slap; what is it with him and older women? First Kylie, then Janet. Whose next. the Queen? Ick.

» by PissedOff on Feb 06, 2004 at 10:53 AM
Tig says:

Wow, you know, as shocked as I was to see Justin rip off part of Janet's shirt, I was more dissapointed in Kid Rock's choice in wardrode. I thought wearing a ripped up American Flag as a T-shirt was disturbing and out of bad taste. However, that's just my opinion. Take it or leave it.

» by Tig on Feb 06, 2004 at 11:49 AM
Tig says:

Oh, and Britney, Uhhh Wow!!! Sound's like you have a few issues to work out with your Doc.

» by Tig on Feb 06, 2004 at 11:51 AM
Zandra Barbera says:

It clearly shows how much our morality has gone down!. It is no big deal that in a civilized society a male can pull down the bustier of a co-female. Shame on the fellow and his followers!!

» by Zandra Barbera on Feb 06, 2004 at 12:03 PM
TAD Margera says:

In An interview with a close friend, Janet said it was planned the whole time. They just didn't feel like sharing it until then, and for a good reason

» by TAD Margera on Feb 06, 2004 at 02:20 PM
Rob Zombie says:

I hate justin timberlake...he sucks...his music sucks...why is he all the hype lately??? trend follower is all he is...no creativity

» by Rob Zombie on Feb 06, 2004 at 02:54 PM
prudence says:

Its not a freakin pasty, its called a nipple shield, its a piercing...but i think that justin timberlake simply didnt know about the whole thing about her top actually coming off, but i do think that janet planned it to keep up publicity with michael

» by prudence on Feb 06, 2004 at 04:00 PM
cowboyinboxers says:

Hey all I think people need to relax about this whole thing it was just a boob! Im in St. Louis and we have the second biggest Mardi Gras celebration in the US. Last year was my first year down there and girls show there boobs for beads you know how it is, but also familys bring there children into the celebration. If your children are old enough to watch and understand the superbowl or mardi gras then no big deal! If they are not old enough then they should be in there room watching Nemo. Thanks all any single st. louis ladies wanna holla

» by cowboyinboxers on Feb 06, 2004 at 04:25 PM
Thought the picture would show more says:

There wasn't even a nipple showing I don't know what all the fuss is about. It's similar to Lil Kim's music award outfit. I think Janet should have bared all since it's already blown out of proportion. I am thinking next "Playboy" will be giving her an offer to pose in their magazine because of the publicity. :)

» by Thought the picture would show more on Feb 06, 2004 at 07:27 PM
Brenna says:

it's not a question of whether it's a "nice boob" or not. this whole thing is just a result of poor marketing. i'm tired of everyone's sexuality thrown in my face. maybe some of us don't want to deal with sex 24/7 - we want some decency. spare the nudity on family national television, please.

» by Brenna on Feb 06, 2004 at 07:56 PM
Nicky says:

i dont know if it was an accident or not but my opinion is that everyone should just lay off Janet cuz firstly she's not the only entertainer that showed a lot of skin(breast) and she wont be the last . So i really dont know y everyone trippin on her. She's very talented and i love her music . Now if this whole incident was'nt an accident then i'm dissapointed in her cuz i don't expect her to lower herself that much.

» by Nicky on Feb 06, 2004 at 09:53 PM
jessi says:

this is to brittany that says justin is dumb: justin would have never broke u with brittany if she wasntsch a Sl#te. justin can do so much better than her and hes not even with janet hes with cameron diaz

» by jessi on Feb 06, 2004 at 11:30 PM
ibigdummy says:

where can i get a pic of janet jackson boob's

» by ibigdummy on Feb 07, 2004 at 01:25 AM
ibigdummy says:

where can i get a pic of janet jackson boob's

» by ibigdummy on Feb 07, 2004 at 01:25 AM
fatbastard says:

omg

» by fatbastard on Feb 07, 2004 at 02:29 AM
Rudi Völler says:

Es scheint mir als ob auf Eurer Seite des Atlantiks einige Menschen
a) entweder ziemlich verklemmt sind
b) oder aber zwiegespalten sind, weil sie für ihr Leben gerne Brüste sehen bzw. über sie diskutieren würden - aber aufgrund ihrer Erziehung denken das dies schmutzig, schmutzig, schmutzig ist!

Habt Ihr nocht nicht bemerkt, dass jedes Kind am Anfang seines Lebens einen Nippel im Mund hat? What's the deal?
(this is German, use google to translate guys and girls...)

» by Rudi Völler on Feb 07, 2004 at 04:52 AM
Aneil says:

hey ppl I'm from Trinidad and Tobago..thats in the caribbean and i want to know where i can get a pic of janet's boobs!

» by Aneil on Feb 07, 2004 at 07:13 AM
bryan says:

where can i find a pic of janets boob?

» by bryan on Feb 07, 2004 at 07:40 AM
M****** says:

wow! that wuz a really saggy tit. But hey it's janet's so everyone likes it

» by M****** on Feb 07, 2004 at 09:57 AM
zap says:

Get the REAL thing at www.bodyartjewelry.com

» by zap on Feb 07, 2004 at 10:45 AM
haha says:

i like janet's boobs ask her if she could lick my penis!

» by haha on Feb 07, 2004 at 05:13 PM
Scorpion says:

I think you all who are hating on Ms. janet Jackson can go eat SHIT!! What was up with the asshole who said that Janet did this to help her flagging career?? You don't know what the fuck you are talking and can die for all I care. That fake ass Britney Spears wanna be can go suck Britney Spears tits b/c Brtney is the one who pulls out a publicity stunt out of her ass every week. Britney is not the shit, Miss Jackson is an ICON and NOT ONE controversial act is going to take that title away from her. Janet Jackson is never in the news for some type of scandal or anything, so you all can let this tit thing go, who gives a shit if ur kids were wtahcing or not, put them rugrats to bed!! Please, a titty is not going to harm you, don't act like it's nothing you;ve never seen before, there has been much more explicit things shown on television than this. Lil Kimcan show up to an award show with her tit hanging out the whole time, FAKE-ASS Britney Spears and aging Madonna make out on stage, but Janet & Justin reveal a tit for 2 SECONDS and the world is like.... OH GOD!! America needs to get a grip because this country is definitley NOT saintly.You better go Janet because you are the shit and is looking HOT for her age, the woman is not that much older than J.Lo,Toni Braxton,Mariah, and some of these rappers. The woman ISN'T forty like Madonna with her old looking ass and can defintely pull off a good tit flash for the guys.Any guy who says that they didn't enjoy it, is 100% G-A-Y!!!! Those boobs are REAL and aren't artificial!! FAGGOTS!!! Fuck Mtv,Cbs,Fcc, and Justin Timberlake for putting the blame on Ms. Jackson when he is the one who ripped it up anyway, JUSTIN is a PUSSY!! Britney Spears is just jealous that she didn't get to expose her tit but Justin did.You people can get on here and say they did it on purpose all you want to but you same faggots can't say that you know for a fact, so you can all CHOKE ON A NIPPLE, for all I care,bitches!!

» by Scorpion on Feb 07, 2004 at 05:59 PM
D.Snith says:

Right On Janet, You Go girl, this little stunt everyone is making a BIG deal about, changes nothing about her.

» by D.Snith on Feb 07, 2004 at 06:46 PM
JOYCE says:

I THINK EVERY JANET JACKSON FAN AND JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE FAN SHOULD NOT WATCH THE GRAMMY AWARDS. THEY WERE DISMISSED TO BE APART OF THE PROGRAM BECAUSE OF AN ACCIDENT YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS ACCIDENT AND I WILL FIGHT BACK BY NOT TUNING IN TO THE GRAMMYS HOPEFULLY OTHERS WILL SHOW SUPPORT FOR THE TWO BY DOING THE SAME.

» by JOYCE on Feb 07, 2004 at 07:48 PM
FOR THE BRITNEY GIRL says:

This is for the Britney girl, obviously you are from another country because in the United States a person is innocent until proven guilty You are are bashing Janet it is clear to see you are a Britney S. fan although she kisses women and expose a great deal of her body in all her videos that's ok with you. As far as Janet's brother Michael you ask why did he do those things again AMERICA (INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY) learn it and live it.

» by FOR THE BRITNEY GIRL on Feb 07, 2004 at 08:11 PM
Babygurl says:

Good googly, It was a friggin' accident. I am sure that Janet and Justin said SORRY a million of times! Janet my dad(s) and brothers think you are sooooo F.I.N.E. Well don't listen to what the wanna-be BRITNEY says, she is just JEALOUS! DUMB ASS BRITNEY!

» by Babygurl on Feb 07, 2004 at 08:18 PM
Starr says:

When are we going to be able to see a disposire of Justin Timberlake?

» by Starr on Feb 07, 2004 at 08:21 PM
DJ says:

Janet, I know it was an accident. Justin was suppose to rip off your first shirt and you are suppose to have a red DRESS on! Love you always DJ. I will always be your fan! By the way nice Tits!! Bye Babe!

» by DJ on Feb 07, 2004 at 08:23 PM
Britt says:

That was such a horrible thing! why is the world like this ??

» by Britt on Feb 07, 2004 at 08:58 PM
Carolyn says:

What next Justin's dick? Where's it going to stop? Get some morals and have a little more respect for yourself. Wrong time, wrong place. Grow up, and realize you career is over.



» by Carolyn on Feb 07, 2004 at 10:04 PM
eiahstar says:

its all a freaking accident!! im a big fan of janet jackson and i also happen to love justin timberlake! the booby was exposed?!! lets get over it! ppl, move on. (and britney has nothing to do with this so leave her alone.. mahn! they've split up a long time ago!)

» by eiahstar on Feb 07, 2004 at 10:11 PM
AllergicToAssholes says:

Britney: Go suck a dick. That cheating whore got played in front of the entire planet by your precious punk ass Justin.
Or did you forget that? You're an idiot & neither one of them know you exist, so go have a pepsi.

» by AllergicToAssholes on Feb 08, 2004 at 01:05 AM
AllergicToAssholes says:

Flagging career? Isn't it funny that comments like this always come from someone who's completely unimformed about
her? Do me a favor, stick to what you now: nascar & bon jovi, stupid cracker.

» by AllergicToAssholes on Feb 08, 2004 at 01:07 AM
Azraelonisium says:

Well, I hate rules and regulations, and since acts like this bring us closer to the state of anarchy that my sect is working toward achieving, I would highly encourage the occurance of like-minded and like-executed public stunts. If we could have Ozzy eat some bat or snake or sth, on public prime TV time, or some more lesbo making out - with tounge and tits - the kids should learn that society's rules and morale are crap and that everything should be deregulated and free.

» by Azraelonisium on Feb 08, 2004 at 05:39 AM
NANCY says:

I THINK ALL OF YOU'LL ARE F#@KED UP! STAY THE FUCK OFF PEOPLES BUSINESS NOSY
SUN OF A b!TC&E$!!!! THANK YOU:)

» by NANCY on Feb 08, 2004 at 05:46 AM
fuk stik says:

you all are way out

» by fuk stik on Feb 08, 2004 at 11:22 AM
lights says:

I think that people forget that there was a red lace bra (or something red) behind that black outfit. I also noticed that she looked down and looked at justin like she was in trouble. Yes the dancing was more on the nc-17 side, but that should be the issue. Not her boob. I think that really was an accident. I think people forget that the music video "toxic" by miss spears. She performed nude with dimonds all over her in the video. I see gays kissing and hugging on many stations. The boob of janet, not a big deal compared to what they do show on tv. O well, maybe the world is screwed up huh?? I also think it messed up the ttv show "ER". The show airs at night. Thats not used out of content. IIts more as a look of what doctors do in educational form.

» by lights on Feb 08, 2004 at 04:03 PM
Daan says:

Well, I live in the Netherlands and the only thing I found disturbing was the vague and hypocrit apologies afterward. If you show your tit because you need more publicity, don't be ambivalent about it. Just say: 'hey its just a nice breast, get used to it'. You can see breasts every day, the cheerleaders were half naked and here in Holland we had full nakedness on television from the sixties on (and nobody made apologies).

» by Daan on Feb 09, 2004 at 04:44 AM

 
This thread is closed to new comments. Thanks to everyone who responded.

More about this page

This entry was published on February 01, 2004 at 11:30 pm.

kottke.org is a weblog about the liberal arts 2.0 edited by Jason Kottke since March 1998. You can read about me and kottke.org here. If you've got questions, concerns, or an interesting link for me, send them along. Here's the kottke.org RSS feed kottke.org RSS feed.

Advertisement

dot dot dot

Advertise on kottke.org via The Deck.

Looking for work?
kottke.org

You're visiting kottke.org. All content by Jason Kottke (contact me) unless otherwise noted, with some restrictions on its use. Good luck will come to those who dig around in the archives. If you've reached this point by accident, I suggest panic.