As important as this particular presidential election is, I'm more interested in the longer term factors affecting the voting process in the US. The electoral college system, how the media's election day coverage influences voter turnout, the construction and dissemination of information to voters by state and federal authorities, the voting process...basically the user experience of voting.
So if you've voted today (or earlier by absentee ballot), I'd like to ask you: how did your voting experience go? Any problems? How did you find out where to go and when? Did you vote using a computer? Any better/worse than a paper ballot? Were election officials helpful? Was there anything in particular you wished had been done differently? If you planned on voting and were unable to, what was the reason? Those are just suggested questions...basically I'd just like you to share the story of your voting experience, from registering to the actual voting process. In sharing our stories, maybe we can have some effect on changing what doesn't work for the next election. Thanks.
Update: Lots of great responses so far (over 200 of them). Thank you and keep 'em coming! See also some election day images from Flickr (here's a shot from inside my voting booth).
The first problem was that the polls where I went too have two lines; one line for each precinct. The lines weren't marked until you actually got into the voting room. That caused much confusion for people in the line (not lines as intended) outside of the room.
Second, the list of names for each precinct was taped to the doors with masking tape. That lasted about 10 minutes.
After that it was smooth sailing. No dangling chads. No broken machines, and no computer voting machines.
The local ballot was somewhat humerous. OF course, there was the Prez issue, the 1 state constitution ammendement, 4,000,000 judges and prosecutors, a school bond issue, and a county child services levy up for renewal. I was surprised that there were so many real issues vs. people running to be judges.
Some didn't receive their ballots in time, even after requesting them a month in advance, then calling their districts several times to follow up. Others received ballots (we live in Pa) with Nader on them, and feared their ballots would be null and void for this reason, no matter who they voted for. Others received ballots with Nader's name covered hastily by blotches of black marker. And we could vote with pencil? Zuh?
Were we to include a copy of a photo ID with the ballot or not? Folks told us we should, but the ballot information explicitly said we were not to include anything but the enclosed ballot materials.
All in all, a fulfilling experience, but not one I'd want to repeat any time soon. It was almost as if someone were keeping our notoriously liberal demographic away from the polls...hmmmm...
I would have liked to cast a paper ballot since the machines in Maryland don't have a paper trail, but the option wasn't there. Otherwise the machine worked quite well (as long as my vote was counted).
One thing of note, when I was being verified, I had to sign two documents and verify my address and phone number. I was surprised by that because when I lived in Virginia all you had to do was give your name. Just thought that was interesting.
Looking forward to a late night tonight!
No hanging chads to be had, for sure. And I was remarkably surprised at how relatively clear the voting process was.
Slip in the ballot, turn the pages (that block out all other choices except that category), punch a little hole. Couldn't be simpler (except, cough, computerized).
Out of all of this, I just hope that voter/citizen apathy is on the decline.
We know where to go from past year's elections, but we always forget our specific precinct and have to look it up on our county's website. We were asked only for our names and addresses, no ID required, and there were no challengers that we could see. One nice thing about pre-dawn voting is that there were no exit pollsters out yet. There was a handy bake sale and coffee stand just outside the voting room though!
Verification was easy, but I also had to show my ID because when I filled out a change of voter address last month, it went to the county courthouse. My finacee didn't have to do this, even though we sent our forms in together.
The semi-computerized system was easy to use. Press the button next to the candidate's name and the light next to it would light up. When you were done, just press the big red Vote button and it would log your votes.
All in all, it was pretty easy.
We wound up at the church (community room fitted up for our wards election) about fifteen minutes early, six people in line before us. I tied Zeke up to a nearby poll, er, pole and we waited. The UPS guy who delivers to our office showed up a couple minutes later and made faces at Zeke, causing him to break out in song. I had to go over and tell Zeke to shutup and lay down and a lady in line came over to give him a biscuit.
The doors opened at 8, by a volunteer and a local cop (K9 division sans dog). We filed into the sub-chamber to be looked up by name and checked off, given a ballot, vote using a marker on paper, re-looked up, and finally the ballot slid into a paper shredder. Well, it looked like a paper shredder but was probably an electronic ballot reader.
Zeke was happy to see me. I took the leash off of him, Kerry & Bush sign wavers both said he was a good dog, and we walked the last mile to the office.
My only complaint is that when I put my "ScanTron" in the machine, I'd very much like to get a reciept in case of a recount.
Finding out where to go was easy; there were lists of polling places at grocery stores, shopping centers, and so on. My wife's company also handed the list out to everyone.
All in all it was a perfectly smooth process. Througout the entire experience I felt that anyone who wanted to vote could find out how to do it.
There's one general election issue I'd like to know people's feeling on. My training is in science and engineering, and in such fields we make measurements all the time. The election, of course, is a measurement: we're measuring public support for competing alternatives. If we assume that roughly 100 million people will vote, and we set as our goal a perfect count, then we're asking for measurement accuracy to eight decimal places. That's more or less unheard of accuracy, except in special circumstances. If you had two quantities match to the fifth or sixth decimal place you'd usually consider them to be equal.
So, my question is: does the American election process really need to get a perfect result down to the last voter, or does it need to 1) clearly distinguish between the alternatives when there is a "significant" difference between them and 2) yield a decisive and unambiguous result even when public support is as evenly divided as it has been in the last couple of elections?
I lean toward the latter as a realistic approach. That of course doesn't mean we shouldn't strive to minimize fraud (accuracy to n+1 decimal places is better than accuracy to n), but it does say that maybe we're getting tied in too much of a knot over all of this stuff. I really worry about the direction we're heading by making everything so controversial.
What do you all think?
Kip
I think this is a very interesting question, but I'd prefer that we ignore it for now and focus on gathering people's voting experience stories. I want to keep this thread as on-topic as possible. Thanks.
And keep the stories coming...I'm happy to hear that things on average are going so well.
This is just the second time that optical scanners are being used here. While I was in line, the scanner started beeping--a person had 'over voted' (voted for two candidates for the same position, for example). But he left before either he or the poll worker had noticed. The scanner wouldn't allow the next voter to insert her ballot until this was acknowledged by the poll worker--apparently, this was the first time it had happened this morning.
I was a little chagrined that people in line could effectively see how others voted as the ballots were fed into the scanner, unless the voters took care to cover the ballots. No one seemed to be worried about this--not the workers, not the voters, not the poll watchers. The MoveOn people were there, as well as Democrats. There may have been some Republicans, but I couldn't tell.
All in all things went smoothly, pretty quickly despite the long lines and everyone seemed to be generally in a good mood. My only complaint was the lack of parking as it seemed everyone had to walk a couple blocks from their cars. Overall a good experience though.
Voted at 715ish, shortly after the polls opened, and there was a fairly decent line, maybe 50-100 people in the two lines (3 wards each).
We still vote with paper ballots, thank god, with fill in the circle choices. But they're electronically counted, which is fine because they keep the real ballot in case of problems.
Some towns here still count by hand. We're probably one of the more backward (thus, accurate) states. ;) Whole news segment last night no how "them durn electronic vote counting machines are just to expensive."
That said, the energy was palpable. People were excited to be there and very patient to get their votes in. I felt energized and even a bit nervous. I hope my overall experience at the polls are an anomoly and others' experiences are most reassuring.
Go Kerry!
The actual ballot is a 1970s-era mechanical booth with a giant lever and all. You vote by toggling metal switches for each candidate. The interface is so confusing to me that I panicked and had to re-check several times to be sure I had flipped the right switches. Very upsetting.
This is in central Florida (Melbourne, to be exact). No problems applying for the absentee ballot (online); got it in plenty of time, the instructions were clear, etc. It would be nice if they specified the correct amount of postage required, thus saving a paranoid trip to the post office counter to avoid it being returned.
I got to the polling place a little after 8 am, found my table to sign in with no wait at all, then waited about 15 minutes in line for the polling machine, got a helpful explanation on how to use the voting machine and then voted and left. It was one of the old 'pull the red lever' machines and everthing was pretty straight forward as far as that goes.
The only annoyance was waiting in line outside, rather than in the air-conditioning. With the clocks moving ahead last weeked, the temperature is about 80 degrees by 7am.
As for the ballot, here in Orange County we get to "fill in the arrow" that points at the candidate for which we are voting. About as easy as anything I did in 3rd grade.
The semi-computerized system was easy to use. Press the button next to the candidate's name and the light next to it would light up. When you were done, just press the big green Vote button and it would log your votes.
I was disappointed that none of the Sunday liquor licenses were up for vote in my district. I was so looking forward to controling who can get me drunk on Sundays.
I also felt bad for the ~150 people in line when I walked out @ 7:45A. They're going to be late for work. I just hope they stuck around and didn't leave.
The media coverage had me expecting long lines. I hope that didn't scare some people away.
I live in a pretty affluent part of Durham. I wonder how the other, predominantly lower class districts fared.
I went around the corner to my old elementary school to vote. It was the first time I had been there in 20 years. We moved this year, and our new voter registration cards arrived shortly after we changed our driver licenses. I was a bit worried, though, because I never received the 'sample ballot.' Not that I use it, but I was concerned nonetheless.
There were about 8 people in front of me at 8:30am. I went to the "P - Z" table, told them my last name, signed in and proceeded to the voting booth. The voting booths are the same I always remember. We use the large stand-up booths -- you pull the lever next to your candidate's name to cast your vote.
I pulled all the levers in quick sucession save one. I angsted over that one, and I still angst over the choice I made.
No hangups, no pollsters, no intimidation, no disenfranchisement. I just hope it's all over quickly.
I wish a) there were an easier and more direct registration system - like once you move and change your postal address, your voting address is changed too; b) the half hour wait was not horrendous, but could have been shorter if the ladies working the books were more efficient - they should just be able to scan your driver's license or passport; c)eventually we should all be able to vote from our homes without the line.
I was one of the first 20 in line, and it only took about 40 minutes to get through and do it. All in all, it was a good experience.
the polling place was a church. the only thing negative i might really say is that the line snaked through the church halls and past the usual stand full of tracts that you would find in just about any church. but of course, there were tracts on the "slippery slope of stem cell research" and right to life and getting help to cure homosexuality... which are obviously issues to some of the christian crowd. definitely not ideal i think. i mean, anybody there that day had their mind made up. i didn't feel badgered to vote one way or another by the tracts, but when you think of fair voting practices, littering the line with opinions supporting the platform of one of the candidates is a bit over the line. this wasn't a matter of free association. i didn't see an amputee vet in a wheelchair and think, "god, war sucks. i'm voting [blah]." we can't wear blinders through the 50 or 100 ft voting bubble. actual literature though? i just hope that by today it was removed or something. if someone can be swayed by a redskins or red sox victory, guilt-inspiring statements like, "the slippery slope of stem cell research" could surely affect at least one vote out there.
maybe if TN was more of a swing state it would matter more. maybe. someone whose parents attend that church remarked that the church had encouraged to keep the tract stand intact, as a way to preach their beliefs to people coming in the door. or something. again, if this wasn't TN, maybe it would matter more. there's a general culture here that from a moral point of view one side is the right side and one is clearly the wrong side. of course, some of us might argue strongly against that. i would, but it's so pervasive that the tinge of guilt trip extends much further outward than 50 or 100 ft from the door of the local church gone polling place.
a few more tracts placed in the voting line are just one more nail in the pile. that's life in the political minority anywhere i suspect.
m.
Ballot was an optical ballot, marked with black felt tip, and read via machine upon completion. The only minutia to worry about was whether or not an election official had initialed the ballot prior to my voting, which it was.
As for the ballot - paper and pencil, mark the box next to your choice 'X', and your ballot gets cranked and stamped into a wooden box to be counted by hand later.
All I had to provide was my name and address, although the voter information card I received from the state a couple of weeks ago indicated photo ID providing proof of residence would be required.
Such a pity considering that I am a very experienced voter and was willing to fly over to the states to make another contribution to democracy.
Well, with a bit of luck, I may be able to try again in four years time. In the mean time, I envy you all.
does the American election process really need to get a perfect result down to the last voter
jkottke says:
I think this is a very interesting question, but I'd prefer that we ignore it for now and focus on gathering people's voting experience stories. I want to keep this thread as on-topic as possible. Thanks.
That's cool. I am interested in peoples thoughts on my question; so if anyone would like to share their opinion with me privately please email me at KipIngram@Yahoo.com.
Happy voting, all!
I was worried that our adventure would be time consuming. But, after the short walk from our downtown apartment, the line was non-existant. Once I changed my address, which only needed a signature from my wife to witness, I recevied my ballot and voted. It took five minutes, tops. Very slick.
Three big lines. The first, about a hundred people long, to verify you're registered to vote.
The second, similar length and snaking back and forth within the gym, to sign your name in the voter log.
Then, and here's the big problem, you step away from that table and get in a third line, also snaking back and forth in the same room to get your voter receipt and the turn that in for your ballot.
There's no control to prevent anyone [say, an unregistered voter, or someone who had already voted that day] from walking into the room and standing in that third line immediately, collecting a receipt and ballot and voting.
I notified the Secretary of State's office.
The entire process was rather smooth and anyone familiar with DC government knows how colossally inefficient they can be. I recieved a handy voter guide in the mail about two weeks before the election and a handy card telling me where my polling place was (conveniently located about a block from my apartment building). They asked for name and had me sign a ledger. No fuss, no muss. Glad I got there early, the line was easily three times as long when I left as when I arrived.
I voted at 8AM CST, and my wife and I were the only ones in the place. Funny, I never got any notification card in the mail as in past elections. Hmmm. Otherwise, things went smoothly- I live in a mostly African-American neighborhood, and hopefully people turn out later in the day.
Louisiana uses electronic voting booths- not touchscreen, but pushbutton. It was very clear what my options were, and how to use the booth.
I almost skipped out on the vote today out of sheer laziness. Even if my vote doesn't count for much in this hopelessly Republican state, I'm glad I got out and voted. I feel great because of it!
Found all the info I needed in regards to when,where and how to vote online. Local gov sites were very helpful.
Got there about 7:45 and stood in line for about 2 hours. Good mix of people in line, young, old, black and white. Lots of children running around entertaining us all.
I thought it was a good turnout considering I live in such a small town, and there were three other voting locations in town.
Tonight it will be fun to watch all the 'news' reporting.
The pollworkers are a collection of very nice old ladies. They seem to have been doing this for a long time, since they all looked familiar from the previous votes I've cast. One of them is getting a little hard-of-hearing, but she's got some back-up.
Our ballots are a connect-the-arrow type of ballot that gets counted by a machine right after you fill it out. You get a nice happy bleep from the machine that confirms that your vote is counted, and I know that my paper ballot has just gone into the big box as a recount-able backup to the computer's count. I'm a fan.
The only issue I saw was an inadvertent case of voter intimidation: I saw 10 or so people turn around and leave after seeing the length of the line. I was the 65th voter in my precinct, and I am sure there were over 125 people in line (and growing) when I left. I hope all the people who left go back and vote later today.
(Oddly enough, My Polling Place doesn't appear to have any data for our precincts. The LA election website will tell you where you need to go, but it's harder to dig up the link.)
Lines weren't bad -- maybe 10 minutes, mostly in the sun. We only had three voting booths, the semi-electronic ones where you press a button and a green arrow lights up next to your selection. If you look down, it also displays your choices in a tiny LCD screen. Voters ranged in age from early 20s to blue-hairs with canes. Sadly, no air conditioning in the building. No campaigners in sight, although a van did drive by and shout "Vote for Kerry, y'all!"
I did see a representative from Voters' Legal Aid on her cell phone. She seemed to be investigating a complaint that the poll workers at my location wouldn't give a voter a provisional ballot. All the poll workers were in their 70s and seemed a little discombobulated. Nevertheless, I made sure to tell them that they were doing a good job. They have to put up with enough shit today -- and I figure if they're in good spirits, they're less likely to be cranky to the legions of potentially confused voters.
I got mail notification with polling places and a second reminder of the deadline to vote absentee, San Francisco does a really good job of making the info impossible to miss.
Different topic for different thread: Some opponents of the electoral college argue that it unfairly awards states with small populations greater per-capita electoral representation. I was thinking yesterday that it would be interesting to analyze how electors would be distributed if they were based not on a state's population, but on that state's production in various sectors of the US economy. My guess is that a very large percentage of our domestic food source (corn, soybeans, wheat, etc....) is grown in Midwestern states that are among those that electoral college opponents cite as wielding undue influence.
By the time I left at 7:10 (I did my homework and actually brought a cheat sheet so I knew how I wanted to vote) there was a small line outside. San Francisco is Kerry Country, so I didn't see any knock-down drag-outs or even anyone in drag, surprisingly. I was hoping I could thrust my finger in righteous indignation at a Republican "poll checker" and yell "Ha!" but apparently in states where the outcome is a given, they'll let just anyone vote! Oh, to live in Ohio, just for one day.
There were only 15-20 people in line, it went very quickly and efficiently. I brought ID, cable bill, and voter registration form just in case, but didn't need it -- just name and address. We do a "complete the arrow" paper ballot, with a magic marker -- I miss the lever machines, though.
The only contested election in my area is for President -- all our local reps are uncontested Democrats, ahhh Massachusetts. We also had a ballot question on protecting civil liberties while fighting terrorism and moving to repeal the USA Patriot Act -- Yes on 1!
I've been a poll observer before, and I have to say the system is LONG overdue for modernization and standardization, despite the comfort of paper ballots. If people can use an ATM and file their taxes online, how can we let the franchise languish in this mess of arcane, bureaucratic rigmarole? Not to mention intimidation and fraud at the polls...sheesh. Good luck, swing staters! GO KERRY!
For my ward, the wait was 1 hour, but for others it was short.
All and all it was pleasant and about the same wait as the last election when the Democrats won (Gore) - bake sale, coffee, chatting with neighbors. All good.
Reading the comments here the one thing that really surprised me is the length of time it seems to take to vote in your country.
Aside from voting for President, there are many local issues to consider as well, such as tax levies for schools, state & local reps, coroner (on our ballot in Columbus, OH.) Plus, my voting place only had 3 machines, so if the line builds up and people take their time, it can take a little while, but it's mostly time spent waiting in line.
Just voted. 4 people ahead of me in lines to about twenty booths...Took all of 10 minutes inside. I did find the OPTECH ballots a little annoying.
if you choose to vote early you can send it through the mail. if you procrastinated till this weekend, like i did, you have to drop the ballot off at a drop site. mine was in our local neighborhood library, on my way home from work. no line. two volunteers with signs indicated wildly from the side of the road that it was a drop site. easy as can be.
Waited in line for about 30minutes.
2 machines (Microvote model)
Can see where there could be confusion with where the arrows point to the canidates on the ballots.
And people wonder why more people haven't voted in years past? This year's voter turnout is going to have record numbers ... and yet it seems that the voting system is just as archaic as ever. An hour and 45 minutes? I can't imagine what the waiting times are going to be like the rest of the day. I thought I was there pretty early - 6:45 AM.
If they want more people to CONTINUE to vote ... in all elections - not just every four years for the President - you've got to make the process go more quickly. It's just not feasible to "go during your lunch hour" ... because if you waited until then - I'm sure it's a 3 hour + wait.
Ah well ... it does feel good to vote though. I stepped out of the booth with a feeling of ... making a difference. Even if I do only count once. (Don't even get me started on how wrong the Electoral College system is.)
The voting booths contained pull-lever machines, with instructions in both English and Spanish. It was pretty straightforward, and satisfyingly mechanical.
Nobody gave me any guff or even asked to see ID, but then again New York is hardly a swing state.
We have paper ballots with the "connect the arrow" type of indicator that the Madison voter described above. I was surprised to see at least 8 different presidential options, and I was not prepared to have to search through the list for "Kerry/Edwards." (Does anyone know what it takes to get onto a Minnesota ballot?) Still, I gladly voted for the Democrats in that race, did the same for our Congressional race, and then went through the requisite local races, tax referendums, and whathaveyou. I fed my ballot into the big machine, watched the counter tick over to "217" and then got my red "I VOTED" sticker on the way out. It was painless, quick, and dare I say, enjoyable. I love my country. I hope we can take it back from the neo-con clowns in charge right now. (sorry, did I let my opinions shine through too much? :) )
We took our two eight-year old boys along with us so they could experience the process (they got "I Voted" stickers and got to help us feed our paper ballots into the scantron-like voting machine).
Total time spent there was under five minutes. The machine said my wife, step-daughter, and I were voters 1133, 1132, and 1131.
After the polls opened at 7:00, the line moved slowly but smoothly. When we got to the door they held us until there was space in the room (a poll worker hold up two fingers indicating two people) and then ushered us in. Apparently our district skews to the early-alphabet last names as the registration line for A-L had about 20 people and the M-Z line (ours!) was empty. Because of this bottleneck there were plenty of empty voting machines. It took about an hour total.
I typically do my research into each of the local races ahead of time and take a crib sheet with me. This is hampered by the lack of a sample ballot in Georgia (I've never received one at least). I was suprised by at least one non-partisan race that I hadn't heard of and had to leave blank.
All-in-all a good experience and I was heartened by the long lines of people and all the of "I'm a Georgia Voter" stickers I saw on the train and street.
No wait whatsoever.... it is Arizona
About 10 booths and 5 open tables
Ballot was both simple and straightforward
Optical scanner made what seemed to be the appropriate ballot approval noises?
Was encouraged so see a Mother discussing the issues with her young son while he filled out some sort of Kid Ballot.
He had a big smile on his face as he pulled the lever of that old voting machine to complete his vote.
At 6:30 AM we where the 76th and 77th voters. As I walked out, I had the sense of being in the presence of my father, one of the many immigrants, a refugee of the Spanish Civil War, most proud of his US citizenship, looking down at us, his son and grandson. Papa always said, show your son the way, don't tell him the way, he will take care of the rest. We the children of immigrants, honor those who came before by praising the opportunity we're given but questioning our leaders when they have strayed from the path set down by the ones who came before us.
- th0m
At least I didn't have to travel for days via mule
like the people in Afganistan.
I stood in two lines -- one based on last name to check into the registration log, and then another one to get a ballot, and I was asked, "Paper or electronic?" I was surprised at that, but said, "Paper." I don't trust voting machines.
I was a little disappointed that there weren't any of the old flag-draped booths that I'd seen when I was little and my mom would take me into the booth with her! I stood in front of a 3-walled, lit cubicle-type thing...it wasn't very secretive at all. I connected the broken arrows with the #2 pencil, and then put the ballot through the machine, where I watched the counter go from 1027 to 1028. All in all, very pleasant.
GO JK. :-)
Then there's also the issue of whether my vote will actually make it into the polling station on time -- after all, it's pretty easy for a large envelope marked with "official election correspondence" coming from an extremely liberal state (NY) to a fairly conservative one (NM) to be accidentally lost or misdirected.
Also, Ralph Nader might have fucked things up too; he got a lot of absentee ballots invalidated because they didn't list him on it. (I'm pretty sure mine did list him, but you never know.) Fucking Nader.
The voting machines in Colorado are fun to use and quite easy if you know how an Ipod works. There is a wheel you turn to scroll trough the selections and a button you press to select it. Some of the older folks in the room were having a little trouble.
The folks checking people's ids were quite nice and quick with their job, much faster than the people at my bank. I was in and out in under 15 minutes, which included filling out some paperwork, reading the machine instructions, checking in, and having a short debate in my mind about an issue I had forgotten about.
The delay was all in the poll workers trying to help people figure out where the people really needed to go.
Once I got my paper ballot and sharpie pen, the voting experience was fairly normal. However, the presidential section was strange and poll workers explained it to every voter (at least while I was there). The Pres. and VP names were so far apart, and the VP appeared so close to the next Pres. candidate that they were afraid people would either vote for Kerry by mistake (instead of Bush, since Cheney's name bumped up with Kerry) or vote twice invalidating their vote.
"And then with this handful of 'sample' ballots, the election official did an astounding thing. 'Does anyone need a sample ballot?' he said in a loud voice, holding up a fist full of the yellow, Democratic 'sample' ballots? 'Anyone?!'"
The voting machines were electronic, but rather simple. You'd enter the curtained voting area. A poll worker would throw a lever or bush a button to activate the process. You would then push a square on the large paper ballot insert. A light behind the selection square would light up to indicate your choice. When you had finished making your selections, you then had to press a big, green "Vote" button below the ballot. The selection lights went out, as did a small overhead light I hadn't noticed on entering.
This bit of confusion really held up the line- the four woman staffers, three of them pushing 75 or 80, seemed confused by default, and this didn't help matters. They finally made a call to the county seat, determined that the couple were at the right polling place, and gave them ballots. I couldn't believe that the staffers had not heard of a provisional ballot until 7:10am on election day- and they had no process for dealing with someone not in the book!
Aside from that, it was smooth sailing. We still have punch card ballots, and this time around, they had two new instructional handouts to help people avoid errors, which was nice.
I used a computer to cast the vote. My only previous voting experience was with paper connect-the-arrow ballots in Massachusetts. The experience was not significantly different.
I did find it interesting that the paper ballots always included abridged text for each ballot initiative, plus an explanation of what a yes or no vote meant. The computer interface only showed one sentence and no explanation of what a yes or no vote would do. Maybe this is just a MD/MA thing. But read up on the intitiatives before you go in!
The Judiciary section was annoying, as there were alot of judges up for confirmation. I pulled the card out and double checked that the hole punch at 4 was correct for the presidential election before I popped the card into the little machine that lets me know if I under or over voted.
When you have to vote for just a few candidate, the hole punch system here works fine. It got ridiculously hard to follow in the judiciary section where each judge needed a yes or no.
One definite user experience issue was the placement of the alphabetical division signs that indicated where you needed to go based on last name. The signs were hung them from the front of the table and they became obscured as soon as a line formed in front of them which was an inconvenience on a day like today.
I presented my voter id card, printed my name and received a paper scantron style ballot. I had to wait a little while to get to a booth, but there were 9 or 10 total and it wasn't a big deal. In retrospect had I had a black pen and been in a big hurry I probably could have just gone up against a wall and filled it out since there was nothing special about the booths. One I was in a booth filling out the sheet the poll workers did announce that they had special privacy ballots available for those that were in a hurry and couldn't wait for a booth.
Despite the fact that the ballot was fairly heavy paper stock I noticed after I flipped it over to fill out the back that my marks from the back side had soaked through and were clearly visible. Luckily the marks didn't allign with the answer space or this could have been an issue I think. The scantron machine happily took my ballot when I was done however (give me a paper trail or give me death!) and the counter indicated I was number 27. I grabbed my little I voted sticker and headed out feeling happy and proud to have voted for the first time in several years.
There was one main queue and then it got broken into 6 queues as you entered the fire station. The queues were based upon the first alphabet of your last name.
And then there was another queue for receiving the ballot. The place was cramped and there was a lot of confusion.
There werent many booths for filing out the ballots, however we could fill out the ballots without going to the booths.
Once you filled out the ballot, you had to deposit it in the optical scanner. The scanner cound was 80 when I deposited my ballot.
I left the station at around 7:05 AM.
The demographics for my area code (43201) are pretty innercity. Of
course, that's the other side of High street. My side of High is
pretty much dandytown. The vote challenger probably had never been to this part of town before and looked a little stymied because there were only white folk to challenge! So, what he did was randomly challenge people which must have been great fun for him until this super bitchy queen (faced with a 2.5 hour wait, anyone can get grumpy -- though most everyone seemed to take it well) TOTALLY STARTED YELLING AT HIM. I mean, YELLING. The situation was defused by a kindly vote monitor (note: I think vote monitors tend to be lieberals and vote challengers tend to be republocrats) who escorted the irrate man from the room but not before our hero hissed "you should be ASHAMED of yourself!"
Other than that, voting was fine. I was kept up late last night because I live right around the corner from the Short North (shortnorth.org) Temple of Kerry and they were tilting at windmills until the late hours. I want to share in their exuberance, but I'm too afraid to get my hopes up.
It did say something like check ID required under my name, but they just looked at my signature and didn't ask for ID.
I volunteered to work the poll with the voter registration office, and was told I would be contacted if there was need. From the looks of things the old folks contingent were there in force and I was never contacted. I also volunteered my services as a designer to consult on readability and legibility for ballots, signage for locating the polling place, etc. I got no response to that offer.
The clerk said that over 25% of registered voters in Los Alamos County had already voted (as of Friday afternoon).
Early voting was extremely convenient for me and I hope that more states add this option in the future.
PS- best reason to vote if you're not in a swing state: if the electoral college doesn't follow the popular vote, you want the difference to be as large as possible as to have the most inertia reform the system!
My absentee ballot arrive in early October, I believe. Off it went. Meanwhile, my wife for whatever reason had lost her registration. It's complicated, when you are overseas, about how long they'll keep you on the polls. End of story -- she had to print a new registration document and request a ballot, then hope this would come in time.
Well, it didn't. We were notified she was registered in mid-October, but still no ballot. Apparently, we could fax in her vote if we really tried. Given we're both voting Kerry and California is exceedingly safe, it just wasn't worth the extra effort. Now if he loses by one vote, then you can come after us.
End of story -- voting from outside the US suck, and it always does. Heck, San Francisco still thinks my residence is a place I lived in 7 years ago. If that's where you last lived, that stays on your record forever -- and sometimes, things may go there, as well.
I dream of a day when I can vote electronically. Yeah, maybe. But as an overseas American, I'm pretty used to being disenfranchised. The census department, for example, doesn't count us. My "local" reps in California don't really care about our unique issues. What I'd love is for all of us overseas to have our own representative that we could vote for. At least they'd have incentive to make the voting process for us easier.
Can't speak to registration, since I've been continuously registered since 1972, but I hear the Republicans are planning to challenge students at the U. We'll see how that goes.
The actual voting process went smoothly - we had touch screens that were very easy to follow.
I saw the line initally and thought 'This will take HOURS!' But the line moved pretty quickly. I am glad I did it this morning, because they think with the record turnout that 500 people could still be in line at 8pm when the polls close. But they still get to vote, which could lead to a long time before we know who wins Wisconsin.
BTW, we use the connect two arrows with a special black pen optical type ballots
On the plus side, the election officials at both polling places were friendly, helpful and informative. This made the actual voting process painless.
It was easy to vote, and the design and setup of the actual ballot left room for no mistakes on what you were voting for. When I was finished, they allowed me to put my ballot in the machine, and it showed that my votes were counted.
The voting machines were electronic, but not precisely touch-screen. Instead, the surface of the voting booth looked like a giant ballot, pre-printed on plastic. There were blinking green lights next to the name of each race -- once you voted in a race by pressing the box containing the person's name, the blinking green light went away, and a solid green X appeared next to the box. Once finished, you registered your votes by pressing the big red "Vote" button down at the bottom.
Two UI problems that I could see:
1) It would have been nice to have a visible indicator that said "You have voted in all races" or some such. I spent as much time double-checking to see if I missed something, as I did voting. Or more. Alternatively, you could get a flag or a 2-step confirmation if you haven't voted in all races. (Perhaps they have this, I don't know.)
2) It would have been good to have some feedback that you have successfully voted other than the machine going dark. I heard several people there saying, "Have I voted now?"
Otherwise, pretty uneventful -- I am sure that it was a mob scene by 8 AM, though.
The trickiest part is finding a parking space in the Town Hall lot, but since voting is quick, someone is usually pulling out just as you need the space.
You climb the stairs to the second floor of Town Hall (there's only one precinct in town) where the registrars, all wearing cheerful red aprons, check you in by street address. When they find your name, they cross it out with a red pencil and hand you a fill-in-the-oval ballot. If you want, you can take a "privacy sleeve."
There were about a dozen and a half boothlets equipped with black markers and instructions ("Don't place children on shelves.") We had, in addition to the Presidential and Congressional questions, local state senate and house, sheriff, and a non-binding referendum question.
After you mark your ballot, you head to the checkout table where another registrar crosses your name off the list to indicate you've voted. A friendly policeman watches as you feed your ballot into the scanning machine.
The only problem I encountered is that some people where going down the up staircase.
The vote machines are fairly low tech (reliable?) "Microvote" boxes I've been used to voting on. The process seems simple and efficient.
We didn't have to wait in line, and everyone was friendly, at 7:00 AM in Hammond, Indiana.
I am giddy with anticpation on the prospect of voting today and have taken tomorrow off - to celebrate if Kerry wins or to sulk if Bush wins!
USA! USA! USA!
I brought my daughter with me so she could observe the process. No lines at all, but there were a steady stream of voters going in and out. The California ballot is loaded with propositions as usual, so you would expect people to take some time to go through it, but most of the people at the polls this morning seemed to be marking their ballots in rapid fire mode. We use the InkaVote system here, where you fill in the bubble using a felt tip pen poker thingy. You compress the spring to make the pen tip have contact with the ballot. I noticed that sometimes it didn't leave a mark even though I pressed down firmly. Bottom line, you have to check and make sure your ballot is marked. After voting, a poll worker takes your ballot and drops it in the ballot box. Sounds like in other places they scan your ballot on the spot. I'll bet that accounts for a lot of the slowness and subsequent lineup. The poll worker handed me an 'I voted' sticker. Gave my daughter one too, which made me happy. I was kinda disappointed that there were no exit pollsters outside this time.
