kottke.org home archives + xml about kottke.org contact me
kottke.org - home of fine hypertext products

My God, it's full of stars...

For reasons which are kind of interesting in a weird way (but won't get into right now[1]), I've changed the movie ratings around these parts from a 100-point scale to a 5-star scale.

And as long as we're talking movies, I've gotten several emails over the past few months to the effect of: "you moron, how can you possibly justify giving the same rating to Casablanca as you gave to Barbershop?" The answer is that I'm not a movie critic (my review of Me and You and Everyone We Know didn't even have anything to do with the actual movie) and my ratings are almost entirely subjective, except when they're somewhat more objective. The subjective/objective ratio depends on the movie and my mood and which star is in the house of which planet and/or Greek god and hence is not to be trusted at all, unless you're a regular reader of my "reviews" and have gotten a sense over many months just what makes me like or dislike particular movies. Also, it's just a stupid rating. You know, for fun. Relax.

[1] Ever wondered why movie ratings assigned by critics are usually on 4 or 5-point scales and not on, say, 100-point scales? Yeah, me neither. But after using the 100-point scale for over a year, I may have discovered part of the reason. 100 is just way too many points[2]. How can there be any tangible difference between a 75 movie and a 76 movie? And when you start looking the whole list of ~220 movies ordered by rank on a 100-point scale, it gets even worse...why are the 15 movies rated 91 better than the 8 movies rated 90? From the standpoint of the rater, thinking about those one or two point differences is a big waste of energy (it gets worse with time as you try to "fit" a particular movie into the ever-lengthening ranked list) and it just confuses the reader anyway.

Also, the stars look nicer[3].

[2] Aggregated ratings (a la Metacritic) are an exception.

[3] I got the star from Zapf Dingbats (the capital H character at 16px). Astute readers will notice the similarity with the iTunes song rating stars, which is not altogether unintentional.

More about this page

This entry was published on July 12, 2005 at 12:14 am.

Tags for this entry:  movies  kottkedotorg 

kottke.org is a weblog about the liberal arts 2.0 edited by Jason Kottke since March 1998. You can read about me and kottke.org here. If you've got questions, concerns, or an interesting link for me, send them along. Here's the kottke.org RSS feed kottke.org RSS feed.

Advertisement

dot dot dot

Advertise on kottke.org via The Deck.

Looking for work? Tags, tags, tags!

Many posts on kottke.org have been "tagged" with keywords, which activity results in collections of related posts like sports, infoviz, or bestof.

Recently popular tags (last 3 weeks)

barackobama   2008election   video   movies   bestof   design   food   books   photography   nyc   lists   remix   music   tv   politics

All-time popular tags

movies   photography   books   nyc   science   food   lists   design   business   sports   video   weblogs   music   bestof   art

Some of my favorite tags

photography   economics   lists   bestof   infoviz   food   nyc   firstworldproblems   cities   restaurants   video   timelapse   interviews   language   maps   fashion   nsfw   remix  

Random tags

sunshine   prison   cities   barcade   marypoppins   lifeafterpeople   realestate   cars   fundraising   hosseinderakhshan   fridakahlo   sony   pentagram   movies   im

kottke.org

You're visiting kottke.org. All content by Jason Kottke (contact me) unless otherwise noted, with some restrictions on its use. Good luck will come to those who dig around in the archives. If you've reached this point by accident, I suggest panic. In memory of DFW, rest in peace. Thanks for everything.